QQQ vs WDNA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund
Which is better, QQQ or WDNA?
Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WDNA over 1Y. WDNA is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WDNA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 3.34% |
| Holdings | 107 | 87 |
| YTD Return | +21.71% | +41.43%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.89% | +57.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.80%Best | +17.20% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.67%Best | -1.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6%Best | 24.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -58.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,706Best | $9,239 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 35.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 3, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2021 to Sep 25, 2026 (5.3 years).
QQQ vs WDNA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs WDNA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.89% while WDNA returned +57.97%. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.71% versus a gain of 41.43% for WDNA.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +28.80% per year against +17.20% for WDNA; over five years the annualized figures are +15.67% and -1.57% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WDNA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.0% compared with 20.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -58.9% for WDNA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WDNA charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $45 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 3.34% for WDNA.
Holdings Overlap
2.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings WDNA also owns. 5.5% of WDNA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
WDNA and QQQ share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 79 in WDNA, against full books of 107 and 87.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 57 positions for WDNA that do not appear in our book for QQQ (75.7% of the fund), and 91 for QQQ that do not appear in WDNA (94.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and WDNA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WDNA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WDNA charges 0.45%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or WDNA?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.89% vs +57.97% for WDNA, so WDNA leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WDNA?
WDNA has been the more volatile fund at 24.0% annualized versus 20.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs WDNA -58.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WDNA?
QQQ and WDNA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WDNA?
5.5% of WDNA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.5% of WDNA's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 79 in WDNA.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WDNA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WDNA yields 3.34%, so WDNA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WDNA better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, WDNA over 1Y. WDNA is less concentrated, with 35.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.