IVV vs WDNA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. WDNA delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | WDNA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.45% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 3.97% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 84 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +37.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +63.54% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +12.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | -1.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 24.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -58.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 3, 2021 |
IVV vs WDNA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Wisdomtree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while WDNA returned +63.54%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 37.11% for WDNA.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +12.92% for WDNA; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and -1.87% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs -1.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WDNA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -58.9% for WDNA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while WDNA charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 3.97% for WDNA.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and WDNA share 18 holdings out of 570 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or WDNA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WDNA charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or WDNA?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +63.54% for WDNA, so WDNA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs -1.03% for WDNA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or WDNA?
WDNA has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WDNA -58.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and WDNA?
IVV and WDNA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WDNA?
IVV and WDNA share 18 common holdings with a 4.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 570 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WDNA?
IVV yields 1.10% while WDNA yields 3.97%, so WDNA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.