RGT vs VTI
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $68M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.38% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.99% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.89% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
RGT vs VTI Performance
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. (RGT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGT returned +25.99% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, RGT is up 17.38% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, RGT compounded at +22.57% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.89% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for RGT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGT charges 1.74% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $3 annually, a gap of $171 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGT currently yields 1.09% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RGT and VTI share 26 holdings out of 2869 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGT or VTI?
RGT has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $171 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGT or VTI?
Over the past year RGT returned +25.99% vs +22.35% for VTI, so RGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RGT annualized +7.64% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGT or VTI?
RGT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RGT -46.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RGT and VTI?
RGT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RGT and VTI?
RGT and VTI share 26 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2869 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGT or VTI?
RGT yields 1.09% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.