RGT vs VOO
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RGT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.74% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $68M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 109 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.38% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.99% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.89% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -46.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 18, 2013 | Sep 7, 2010 |
RGT vs VOO Performance
Royce Global Value Trust Inc. (RGT) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGT returned +25.99% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, RGT is up 17.38% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, RGT compounded at +22.57% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.89% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +7.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.8% for RGT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGT charges 1.74% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $174 vs $3 annually, a gap of $171 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGT currently yields 1.09% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
RGT and VOO share 1 holdings out of 612 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGT | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TDY | 0.68% | 0.05% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGT or VOO?
RGT has an expense ratio of 1.74% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $171 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RGT or VOO?
Over the past year RGT returned +25.99% vs +21.87% for VOO, so RGT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RGT annualized +7.64% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RGT or VOO?
RGT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RGT -46.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RGT and VOO?
RGT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RGT and VOO?
RGT and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 612 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGT or VOO?
RGT yields 1.09% while VOO yields 1.08%, so RGT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.