ROM vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Technology vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ROM or VOO?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ROM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 90 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +48.63%Best | +11.01% |
| 1Y Return | +62.90%Best | +15.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +50.05%Best | +20.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.15%Best | +12.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.6% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.5% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $25,039Best | $18,101 |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16 years).
ROM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ROM vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROM returned +62.90% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, ROM is up 48.63% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Over three years, ROM compounded at +50.05% per year against +20.82% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +20.15% and +12.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, ROM has the edge at +33.32% annualized vs +13.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.5% for ROM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROM charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROM currently yields 0.06% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 36.4% of VOO's money is in holdings ROM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ROM, our book for it covers 61.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
71 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in ROM and 494 in VOO, against full books of 90 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.37% | 7.55% | 0.82% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.29% | 7.05% | 0.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.90% | 5.36% | 0.54% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.75% | 2.86% | 0.11% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.33% | 1.44% | 0.89% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.29% | 1.21% | 1.08% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.67% | 0.71% | 0.96% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.69% | 0.66% | 1.03% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 1.64% | 0.44% | 1.20% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.39% | 0.63% | 0.76% |
36.4% of VOO is already inside ROM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROM or VOO?
ROM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ROM or VOO?
Over the past year ROM returned +62.90% vs +15.60% for VOO, so ROM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ROM annualized +33.32% vs +13.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ROM or VOO?
ROM has been the more volatile fund at 39.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ROM -67.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ROM and VOO?
ROM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ROM and VOO?
At least 36.4% of VOO's money is in holdings ROM also owns. Our book for ROM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 71 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in ROM and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROM or VOO?
ROM yields 0.06% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ROM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ROM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.