ROM vs VYM
ProShares Ultra Technology vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, ROM or VYM?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ROM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.2B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 90 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +55.05%Best | +12.29% |
| 1Y Return | +71.06%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +52.13%Best | +17.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.89%Best | +12.12% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.8% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -83.8% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $26,905Best | $17,718 |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2007 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.6 years).
ROM vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ROM vs VYM Performance
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROM returned +71.06% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, ROM is up 55.05% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Over three years, ROM compounded at +52.13% per year against +17.42% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +21.89% and +12.12% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, ROM has the edge at +23.94% annualized vs +6.74%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for ROM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROM charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROM currently yields 0.06% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 15.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ROM also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ROM, our book for it covers 61.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VYM and ROM share little of their money.
20 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in ROM and 557 in VYM, against full books of 90 and 613.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ROM | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.75% | 7.35% | 4.60% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.67% | 1.86% | 0.19% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.91% | 1.02% | 0.11% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 0.97% | 0.90% | 0.07% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.01% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.06% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.69% | 0.63% | 0.06% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| ACN:IEAccenture plc, Class A | 0.45% | 0.41% | 0.04% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.27% | 0.26% | 0.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ROM and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROM or VYM?
ROM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ROM or VYM?
Over the past year ROM returned +71.06% vs +16.61% for VYM, so ROM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ROM annualized +23.94% vs +6.74% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ROM or VYM?
ROM has been the more volatile fund at 41.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ROM -83.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ROM and VYM?
ROM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ROM and VYM?
At least 15.8% of VYM's money is in holdings ROM also owns. Our book for ROM is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 74 positions we hold weights for in ROM and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROM or VYM?
ROM yields 0.06% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than ROM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ROM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.