RSMC vs VTI
Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, RSMC or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSMC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $774M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.01% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.3% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $11,291 | $13,563Best |
| Fund Family | Rockefeller Capital Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 11, 2024 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.9 years).
RSMC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
RSMC vs VTI Performance
Rockefeller US Small-Mid Cap ETF (RSMC) is an ETF from Rockefeller Capital Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSMC returned +8.01% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, RSMC is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.3% for RSMC and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSMC charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSMC currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 72.7% of RSMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of RSMC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, RSMC as of Aug 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
35 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in RSMC and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 47 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSMC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HASIHa Sustainable Infrastructure Capital Inc | 4.02% | 0.00% | 4.02% |
| FCFSFirstcash Inc | 3.49% | 0.01% | 3.48% |
| SNEXStonex Group Inc | 3.16% | 0.01% | 3.15% |
| SNXSynnex Technology International Co | 3.13% | 0.03% | 3.10% |
| KFYKorn Ferry | 2.82% | 0.00% | 2.82% |
| BJBj'S Wholesale Club Holdings Inc | 2.57% | 0.02% | 2.55% |
| PRMBPrimo Brands Corp | 2.54% | 0.00% | 2.54% |
| MLIMueller Industries Inc | 2.43% | 0.02% | 2.41% |
| CHDNChurchill Downs Inc | 2.38% | 0.00% | 2.38% |
| CSWICsw Industrials, Inc. | 2.26% | 0.00% | 2.26% |
72.7% of RSMC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSMC or VTI?
RSMC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSMC or VTI?
Over the past year RSMC returned +8.01% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSMC annualized +6.60% vs +17.40% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSMC or VTI?
RSMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSMC -22.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both RSMC and VTI?
RSMC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSMC and VTI?
At least 72.7% of RSMC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in RSMC and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSMC or VTI?
RSMC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than RSMC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.