RSPH vs VXUS
RSPH vs VXUS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RSPH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPH | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $752M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +11.46% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.45% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.89% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.48% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RSPH vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPH returned +28.45% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RSPH is up 11.46% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, RSPH compounded at +6.89% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +3.48% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, RSPH has the edge at +10.59% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.1% for RSPH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPH charges 0.40% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $5 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPH currently yields 0.70% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RSPH and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7922 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPH or VXUS?
RSPH has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPH or VXUS?
Over the past year RSPH returned +28.45% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so RSPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RSPH annualized +10.59% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPH or VXUS?
RSPH has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RSPH -41.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RSPH and VXUS?
RSPH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPH and VXUS?
RSPH and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7922 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPH or VXUS?
RSPH yields 0.70% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.