RSPH vs VOO
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RSPH or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RSPH led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPH is less concentrated, with 22.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPH | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $839M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 62 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.19%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +26.96%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.97% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.19% | +13.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.6%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,278 | $18,827Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.4%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16 years).
RSPH vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
RSPH vs VOO Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPH returned +26.96% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, RSPH is up 15.19% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, RSPH compounded at +9.97% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.19% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs +12.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.6% for RSPH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPH charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPH currently yields 0.62% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of RSPH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.1% of VOO's money is in holdings RSPH also owns.
Most of RSPH is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
59 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in RSPH and 494 in VOO, against full books of 62 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 429 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RSPH (90.1% of the fund), and 1 for RSPH that do not appear in VOO (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSPH | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 4.39% | 0.03% | 4.36% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.47% | 1.41% | 0.06% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.61% | 0.96% | 0.65% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 2.51% | 0.05% | 2.46% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.64% | 0.69% | 0.95% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.78% | 0.50% | 1.28% |
| CRLCharles River Laboratories International Inc | 2.23% | 0.02% | 2.21% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 1.84% | 0.33% | 1.51% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.84% | 0.32% | 1.52% |
| IQVI Q V I A Holdings Inc. | 2.07% | 0.06% | 2.01% |
100.0% of RSPH is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPH or VOO?
RSPH has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RSPH or VOO?
Over the past year RSPH returned +26.96% vs +16.61% for VOO, so RSPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), RSPH annualized +12.80% vs +13.39% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RSPH or VOO?
RSPH has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RSPH -30.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both RSPH and VOO?
RSPH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPH and VOO?
100.0% of RSPH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.1% of VOO's is in holdings RSPH also owns. They hold 59 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in RSPH and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPH or VOO?
RSPH yields 0.62% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RSPH?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RSPH led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPH is less concentrated, with 22.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.