RSPH vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. RSPH delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $752M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.99% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.74% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.38% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.08% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
RSPH vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPH returned +28.74% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, RSPH is up 12.99% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPH compounded at +7.38% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.08% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RSPH has the edge at +10.66% annualized vs +8.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.1% for RSPH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPH charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPH currently yields 0.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSPH and VTI share 56 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPH or VTI?
RSPH has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPH or VTI?
Over the past year RSPH returned +28.74% vs +23.31% for VTI, so RSPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPH annualized +10.66% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPH or VTI?
RSPH has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RSPH -41.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPH and VTI?
RSPH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPH and VTI?
RSPH and VTI share 56 common holdings with a 7.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPH or VTI?
RSPH yields 0.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.