IVV vs RSPH
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. RSPH delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSPH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $752M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.70% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +13.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +25.09% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +7.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +3.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -41.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 1, 2006 |
IVV vs RSPH Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while RSPH returned +25.09%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 13.18% for RSPH.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +7.43% for RSPH; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +3.86% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, RSPH has the edge at +10.66% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSPH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -41.1% for RSPH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPH charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.70% for RSPH.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RSPH share 59 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPH?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPH charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RSPH?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +25.09% for RSPH, so RSPH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +10.66% for RSPH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSPH?
RSPH has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RSPH -41.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSPH?
IVV and RSPH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPH?
IVV and RSPH share 59 common holdings with a 8.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPH?
IVV yields 1.09% while RSPH yields 0.70%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.