RSPS vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSPS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $250M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.21% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.33% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.49% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.87% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
RSPS vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSPS returned +3.33% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, RSPS is up 9.21% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, RSPS compounded at +0.49% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.87% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.0% for RSPS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.5% for RSPS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSPS charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSPS currently yields 2.97% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RSPS and VTI share 34 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSPS or VTI?
RSPS has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSPS or VTI?
Over the past year RSPS returned +3.33% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), RSPS annualized +6.92% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSPS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.0% for RSPS. Worst drawdown: RSPS -37.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RSPS and VTI?
RSPS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSPS and VTI?
RSPS and VTI share 34 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSPS or VTI?
RSPS yields 2.97% while VTI yields 1.07%, so RSPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.