RUNN vs VXUS
RUNN vs VXUS
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RUNN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $392M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 59 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.44% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.72% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.27% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Running Oak Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RUNN vs VXUS Performance
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is a ETF from Running Oak Capital and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RUNN returned +4.72% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, RUNN is up 5.44% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, RUNN compounded at +10.27% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, RUNN has the edge at +11.68% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for RUNN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for RUNN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RUNN charges 0.58% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $5 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RUNN currently yields 0.57% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RUNN and VXUS share 2 holdings out of 7917 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RUNN or VXUS?
RUNN has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RUNN or VXUS?
Over the past year RUNN returned +4.72% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RUNN annualized +11.68% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RUNN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for RUNN. Worst drawdown: RUNN -16.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RUNN and VXUS?
RUNN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RUNN and VXUS?
RUNN and VXUS share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7917 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RUNN or VXUS?
RUNN yields 0.57% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.