QQQ vs RUNN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RUNN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $412M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 59 | |
| YTD Return | +19.52% | +5.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.68% | +3.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.64% | +10.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.36% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 12.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Running Oak Capital | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 7, 2023 |
QQQ vs RUNN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is a ETF from Running Oak Capital. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% while RUNN returned +3.36%. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.52% versus a gain of 5.64% for RUNN.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +26.64% per year against +10.54% for RUNN. Across the full 3-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.3% for RUNN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -16.8% for RUNN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RUNN charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $58 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.54% for RUNN.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RUNN share 5 holdings out of 155 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RUNN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RUNN charges 0.58%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RUNN?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.68% vs +3.36% for RUNN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.14% vs +11.67% for RUNN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RUNN?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.3% for RUNN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RUNN -16.8%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RUNN?
QQQ and RUNN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RUNN?
QQQ and RUNN share 5 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 155 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RUNN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RUNN yields 0.54%, so RUNN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.