IVV vs RUNN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RUNN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.58% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $392M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.57% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 59 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +5.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +5.30% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +10.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Running Oak Capital | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 7, 2023 |
IVV vs RUNN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is a ETF from Running Oak Capital. Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while RUNN returned +5.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 5.89% for RUNN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +10.29% for RUNN. Across the full 3-year window we track, RUNN has the edge at +11.78% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.4% for RUNN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.8% for RUNN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RUNN charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.57% for RUNN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and RUNN share 39 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RUNN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RUNN charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or RUNN?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +5.30% for RUNN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +11.78% for RUNN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or RUNN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.4% for RUNN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RUNN -16.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and RUNN?
IVV and RUNN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RUNN?
IVV and RUNN share 39 common holdings with a 5.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RUNN?
IVV yields 1.09% while RUNN yields 0.57%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.