IVV vs RUNN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
Which is better, IVV or RUNN?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RUNN is less concentrated, with 21.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RUNN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.58% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $411M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.54% |
| Holdings | 508 | 59 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | -0.65% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | -2.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17%Best | +9.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 12.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -16.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $18,922Best | $13,378 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 21.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Running Oak Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 7, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 8, 2023 to Sep 21, 2026 (3.3 years).
IVV vs RUNN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RUNN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is an ETF from Running Oak Capital. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while RUNN returned -2.58%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a loss of 0.65% for RUNN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.17% per year against +9.54% for RUNN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.5% for RUNN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -16.8% for RUNN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RUNN charges 0.58%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $58 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.54% for RUNN.
Holdings Overlap
6.3% of IVV's money is in holdings RUNN also owns. 63.8% of RUNN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
37 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 59 in RUNN, against full books of 508 and 59.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for RUNN that do not appear in our book for IVV (33.5% of the fund), and 446 for IVV that do not appear in RUNN (92.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RUNN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 1.41% | 0.98% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 1.91% | 0.96% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 0.23% | 2.42% | 2.19% |
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 0.03% | 2.52% | 2.49% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.17% | 2.12% | 1.95% |
| AJGArthur J Gallagher & Co. | 0.10% | 2.11% | 2.01% |
| FDSFactset Research Systems Inc. | 0.02% | 2.17% | 2.15% |
| BROBrown & Brown Inc | 0.03% | 2.03% | 2.00% |
| CNCCentene | 0.05% | 1.97% | 1.92% |
| JJacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 0.03% | 1.98% | 1.95% |
63.8% of RUNN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RUNN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RUNN charges 0.58%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RUNN?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs -2.58% for RUNN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RUNN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.5% for RUNN. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RUNN -16.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and RUNN?
IVV and RUNN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RUNN?
63.8% of RUNN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 63.8% of RUNN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 59 in RUNN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RUNN?
IVV yields 1.06% while RUNN yields 0.54%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RUNN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. RUNN is less concentrated, with 21.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.