RUNN vs VTI
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RUNN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $392M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 59 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.57% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.71% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.17% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Running Oak Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
RUNN vs VTI Performance
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is a ETF from Running Oak Capital and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RUNN returned +3.71% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, RUNN is up 5.57% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, RUNN compounded at +10.17% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, RUNN has the edge at +11.66% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.3% for RUNN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.8% for RUNN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RUNN charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RUNN currently yields 0.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
RUNN and VTI share 46 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RUNN or VTI?
RUNN has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RUNN or VTI?
Over the past year RUNN returned +3.71% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), RUNN annualized +11.66% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RUNN or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.3% for RUNN. Worst drawdown: RUNN -16.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both RUNN and VTI?
RUNN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RUNN and VTI?
RUNN and VTI share 46 common holdings with a 5.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RUNN or VTI?
RUNN yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.