SATO vs VOO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SATO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.27% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 120 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -16.96% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -25.19% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.72% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SATO vs VOO Performance
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Economy ETF (SATO) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SATO returned -25.19% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, SATO is down 16.96% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, SATO compounded at +24.72% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -4.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SATO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.0% for SATO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SATO charges 0.66% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SATO currently yields 7.27% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SATO and VOO share 10 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SATO or VOO?
SATO has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SATO or VOO?
Over the past year SATO returned -25.19% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SATO annualized -4.58% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SATO or VOO?
SATO has been the more volatile fund at 67.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SATO -88.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SATO and VOO?
SATO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SATO and VOO?
SATO and VOO share 10 common holdings with a 6.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SATO or VOO?
SATO yields 7.27% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SATO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.