SBIO vs TLTP
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
TLTP has a lower expense ratio. SBIO delivered stronger 1-year returns. SBIO offers more diversification with 107 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SBIO | TLTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $221M | $25M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 15.05% | |
| Holdings | 107 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +34.13% | -9.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +94.23% | -7.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.61% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.41% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.6% | 8.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.1% | -12.7% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2014 | Oct 29, 2024 |
SBIO vs TLTP Performance
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF (SBIO) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year SBIO returned +94.23% while TLTP returned -7.61%. Year to date, SBIO is up 34.13% versus a loss of 9.10% for TLTP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SBIO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.6% compared with 8.6% for TLTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.1% for SBIO and -12.7% for TLTP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SBIO charges 0.50% per year while TLTP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $39 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SBIO currently yields 0.00% against 15.05% for TLTP.
Holdings Overlap
SBIO and TLTP share 0 holdings out of 108 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SBIO or TLTP?
SBIO has an expense ratio of 0.50% while TLTP charges 0.39%. TLTP is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SBIO or TLTP?
Over the past year SBIO returned +94.23% vs -7.61% for TLTP, so SBIO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SBIO annualized +9.73% vs -5.19% for TLTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SBIO or TLTP?
SBIO has been the more volatile fund at 29.6% annualized versus 8.6% for TLTP. Worst drawdown: SBIO -63.1% vs TLTP -12.7%.
Should I hold both SBIO and TLTP?
SBIO and TLTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SBIO and TLTP?
SBIO and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 108 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SBIO or TLTP?
SBIO yields 0.00% while TLTP yields 15.05%, so TLTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.