THOR vs VTI
Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, THOR or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | THOR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $24M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.56% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Fund Family | Thornburg Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
THOR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
THOR vs VTI Performance
Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, THOR is up 4.56% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
THOR charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THOR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.6% of VTI's money is in holdings THOR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and THOR share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 55 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in THOR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.35% | 2.56% | 0.21% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 3.94% | 0.05% | 3.89% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 3.18% | 0.22% | 2.96% |
| CMECme Group, Cl A | 2.46% | 0.13% | 2.33% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.13% | 0.45% | 1.68% |
| EQHEquitable Holdings Inc. | 2.52% | 0.02% | 2.50% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.84% | 0.61% | 1.23% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.97% | 0.15% | 1.82% |
| RFRegions Financial Corp. | 1.96% | 0.04% | 1.92% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.95% | 0.46% | 0.49% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of THOR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, THOR or VTI?
THOR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between THOR and VTI?
At least 5.6% of VTI's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, THOR or VTI?
THOR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than THOR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.