THOR vs VOO

THOR vs VOO

Which is better, THOR or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTHORVOO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$24M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings55509
YTD Return+4.56%+11.01%Best
1Y Return-+15.60%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.82%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.60%
Fund FamilyThornburg Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 22, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

THOR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

THOR vs VOO Performance

Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, THOR is up 4.56% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

THOR charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THOR currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

VOO already in THOR6.3%

At least 6.3% of VOO's money is in holdings THOR also owns.

Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 94.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

VOO and THOR share little of their money.

11 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 55 and 509.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in THORWeight in VOODifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.35%2.86%0.51%
KMBKimberly-Clark Corp.3.94%0.06%3.88%
TBBAt&t Inc3.18%0.25%2.93%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.13%0.50%1.63%
CMECme Group, Cl A2.46%0.15%2.31%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.84%0.69%1.15%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares1.97%0.17%1.80%
RFRegions Financial Corp.1.96%0.04%1.92%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares0.79%0.71%0.08%
HDHome Depot Inc/The0.95%0.51%0.44%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of THOR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

THORVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, THOR or VOO?

THOR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between THOR and VOO?

At least 6.3% of VOO's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, THOR or VOO?

THOR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than THOR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.