THOR vs VOO

THOR vs VOO

Which is better, THOR or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. THOR is less concentrated, with 30.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: THOR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTHORVOO
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$35M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings59506
YTD Return+0.73%+14.82%Best
1Y Return-+18.67%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.91%
Top 10 Weight30.9%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyThornburg Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 22, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

THOR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

THOR vs VOO Performance

Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, THOR is up 0.73% versus a gain of 14.82% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

THOR charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, THOR currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

THOR already in VOO23.0%
VOO already in THOR6.3%

23.0% of THOR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.3% of VOO's money is in holdings THOR also owns.

THOR and VOO share little of their money.

11 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 494 in VOO, against full books of 59 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 476 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for THOR (92.9% of the fund), and 4 for THOR that do not appear in VOO (7.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in THORWeight in VOODifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.05%2.86%0.19%
KMBKimberly-Clark Corp.3.60%0.06%3.54%
TAT&T Inc3.20%0.25%2.95%
MRKMerck & Company Inc2.11%0.50%1.61%
CMECme Group, Cl A2.43%0.15%2.28%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.1.89%0.69%1.20%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares2.00%0.17%1.83%
RFRegions Financia1.99%0.04%1.95%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares0.82%0.71%0.11%
HDHome Depot Inc/The0.91%0.51%0.40%

23.0% of THOR is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

THORVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, THOR or VOO?

THOR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between THOR and VOO?

23.0% of THOR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.3% of VOO's is in holdings THOR also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in THOR and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, THOR or VOO?

THOR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than THOR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. THOR is less concentrated, with 30.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.