SCHD vs TRUN
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs VanEck Energy TruSector ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TRUN?
SCHD costs less.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 82.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TRUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.16% |
| AUM | $112.2B | $276,689.12 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 103 | 23 |
| YTD Return | +27.56%Best | +15.47% |
| 1Y Return | +30.29% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.37% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.5%Best | 82.7% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jul 7, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TRUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TRUN Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and VanEck Energy TruSector ETF (TRUN) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, SCHD is up 27.56% versus a gain of 15.47% for TRUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TRUN charges 0.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $16 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.13% against 0.00% for TRUN.
Holdings Overlap
13.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings TRUN also owns. 28.1% of TRUN's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
TRUN and SCHD share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 22 in TRUN, against full books of 103 and 23.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 100 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 92 positions TRUN does not, 86.0% of the fund.
Largest: ABT 4.70%, AMGN 4.62%, HD 4.32%, MRK 4.26%, KO 4.20%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in TRUN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.74% | 13.25% | 9.51% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 3.59% | 5.32% | 1.73% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.89% | 2.73% | 0.84% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 1.80% | 2.58% | 0.78% |
| OKEOneok Inc Sr Unsec | 1.36% | 2.00% | 0.64% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corporation | 1.24% | 1.76% | 0.52% |
| APAApa Corp | 0.33% | 0.45% | 0.12% |
28.1% of TRUN is already inside SCHD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TRUN?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TRUN charges 0.16%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TRUN?
28.1% of TRUN's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 28.1% of TRUN's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 22 in TRUN.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TRUN?
SCHD yields 3.13% while TRUN yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TRUN better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 82.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.