IVV vs TRUN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Energy TruSector ETF
Which is better, IVV or TRUN?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TRUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.16% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $276,689.12 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 23 |
| YTD Return | +13.23% | +13.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.38% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.67% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.13% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 84.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 7, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
IVV vs TRUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs TRUN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Energy TruSector ETF (TRUN) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, IVV is up 13.23% versus a gain of 13.83% for TRUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TRUN charges 0.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $16 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TRUN.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of IVV's money is in holdings TRUN also owns. 75.3% of TRUN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of TRUN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in TRUN, against full books of 508 and 23.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 462 positions TRUN does not, 95.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, MSFT 5.69%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TRUN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.01% | 24.47% | 23.46% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.58% | 13.37% | 12.79% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.24% | 5.63% | 5.39% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.16% | 3.52% | 3.36% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.16% | 3.45% | 3.29% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.15% | 3.06% | 2.91% |
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 0.14% | 3.06% | 2.92% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.14% | 2.58% | 2.44% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 0.12% | 2.39% | 2.27% |
| BKRBaker Hughes Co | 0.10% | 1.86% | 1.76% |
75.3% of TRUN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TRUN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TRUN charges 0.16%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TRUN?
75.3% of TRUN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 75.3% of TRUN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 22 in TRUN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TRUN?
IVV yields 1.06% while TRUN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TRUN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.