QQQ vs TRUN
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs VanEck Energy TruSector ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TRUN?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
TRUN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TRUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.16%Best |
| AUM | $483.5B | $276,689.12 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 23 |
| YTD Return | +21.71%Best | +12.88% |
| 1Y Return | +25.89% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.80% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.67% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 84.8% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jul 7, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs TRUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TRUN Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and VanEck Energy TruSector ETF (TRUN) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, QQQ is up 21.71% versus a gain of 12.88% for TRUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TRUN charges 0.16%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $16 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for TRUN.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings TRUN also owns. 3.0% of TRUN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
TRUN and QQQ share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 22 in TRUN, against full books of 107 and 23.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 102 and 22 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 94 positions TRUN does not, 97.0% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and TRUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TRUN?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TRUN charges 0.16%. TRUN is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TRUN?
3.0% of TRUN's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 3.0% of TRUN's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 22 in TRUN.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TRUN?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TRUN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TRUN better than QQQ?
TRUN has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.