TRUN vs VXUS
VanEck Energy TruSector ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, TRUN or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TRUN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.16% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $276,689.12 | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 23 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +15.47% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.09% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 7, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
TRUN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TRUN vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Energy TruSector ETF (TRUN) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TRUN is up 15.47% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TRUN charges 0.16% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $16 vs $5 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TRUN currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.0% of TRUN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in TRUN and 8,094 in VXUS, against full books of 23 and 8,747.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 22 and 8,094 positions we hold weights for.
VXUS holds 49 positions TRUN does not, 2.0% of the fund.
Largest: SHEL 0.48%, BALN 3.4 04/15/30 14 0.16%, PRYMY 0.11%, VWO 0.11%, BASFY 0.11%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TRUN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALHalliburton Co. | 0.97% | 0.02% | 0.95% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TRUN and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TRUN or VXUS?
TRUN has an expense ratio of 0.16% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, TRUN or VXUS?
TRUN yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than TRUN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.