SCHD vs XLG

SCHD vs XLG

Which is better, SCHD or XLG?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, XLG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHDXLG
Expense Ratio0.06%Best0.20%
AUM$112.1B$11.0B
Dividend Yield3.00%0.64%
Holdings10353
YTD Return+24.23%Best+6.99%
1Y Return+27.90%Best+11.25%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.55%+22.03%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.97%+14.04%Best
Volatility (annualized)13.6%Best14.6%
Max Drawdown-33.4%-30.8%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$16,083$19,288Best
Top 10 Weight41.8%Best60.3%
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 20, 2011May 4, 2005

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 17, 2026 (14.9 years).

SCHD vs XLG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.

SCHD vs XLG Performance

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SCHD returned +27.90% while XLG returned +11.25%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.23% versus a gain of 6.99% for XLG.

Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.55% per year against +22.03% for XLG; over five years the annualized figures are +9.97% and +14.04% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, XLG has the edge at +14.49% annualized vs +11.30%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -30.8% for XLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XLG charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $20 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.64% for XLG.

Holdings Overlap

SCHD already in XLG37.8%
XLG already in SCHD7.1%

37.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings XLG also owns. 7.1% of XLG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

10 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 52 in XLG, against full books of 103 and 53.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 41 positions for XLG that do not appear in our book for SCHD (91.1% of the fund), and 89 for SCHD that do not appear in XLG (62.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHDWeight in XLGDifference
MRKMerck & Company Inc4.77%0.88%3.89%
KOCoca Cola Co.4.17%0.83%3.34%
CVXChevron Corp4.02%0.94%3.08%
HDHome Depot Inc/The3.88%0.79%3.09%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated3.82%0.85%2.97%
PGProcter & Gamble Company3.83%0.81%3.02%
VZVerizon Communic3.97%0.50%3.47%
PEPPepsico Inc.3.64%0.46%3.18%
TXNTexas Instrument Inc3.13%0.57%2.56%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.2.52%0.43%2.09%

37.8% of SCHD is already inside XLG.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SCHDXLG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHD or XLG?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XLG charges 0.20%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SCHD or XLG?

Over the past year SCHD returned +27.90% vs +11.25% for XLG, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.30% vs +14.49% for XLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SCHD or XLG?

XLG has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs XLG -30.8%.

Should I hold both SCHD and XLG?

SCHD and XLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XLG?

37.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings XLG also owns. 7.1% of XLG's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 52 in XLG.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XLG?

SCHD yields 3.00% while XLG yields 0.64%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XLG better than SCHD?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, XLG over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.