SCHD vs XQQI

SCHD vs XQQI

Which is better, SCHD or XQQI?

Large Cap Value against Multi Alternative.

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.0%.

Lower Fees: SCHDLess Concentrated: SCHD

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHDXQQI
Expense Ratio0.06%Best0.98%
AUM$112.1B$315M
Dividend Yield3.00%11.96%
Holdings103108
YTD Return+24.04%Best+10.99%
1Y Return+27.95%-
3Y Return (annualized)+15.51%-
5Y Return (annualized)+9.80%-
Top 10 Weight41.8%Best47.0%
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementNEOS
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap ValueMulti Alternative
InceptionOct 20, 2011Feb 2, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SCHD vs XQQI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SCHD vs XQQI Performance

Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI) is an ETF from NEOS. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.04% versus a gain of 10.99% for XQQI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHD charges 0.06% per year while XQQI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $98 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 11.96% for XQQI.

Holdings Overlap

SCHD already in XQQI21.5%
XQQI already in SCHD5.1%

21.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings XQQI also owns. 5.1% of XQQI's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.

SCHD and XQQI share little of their money.

8 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 102 in XQQI, against full books of 103 and 108.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 88 positions for XQQI that do not appear in our book for SCHD (93.2% of the fund), and 91 for SCHD that do not appear in XQQI (78.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHDWeight in XQQIDifference
AMGNAmgen Inc.4.70%1.06%3.64%
PEPPepsico Inc.3.64%0.88%2.76%
TXNTexas Instrument Inc3.13%1.08%2.05%
QCOMQualcomm Inc.2.52%0.80%1.72%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.2.79%0.52%2.27%
CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa2.31%0.43%1.88%
FASTFastenal Co.1.38%0.21%1.17%
PAYXPaychex, Inc.1.00%0.16%0.84%

21.5% of SCHD is already inside XQQI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SCHDXQQI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHD or XQQI?

SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while XQQI charges 0.98%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and XQQI?

21.5% of SCHD's money is in holdings XQQI also owns. 5.1% of XQQI's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 102 in XQQI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or XQQI?

SCHD yields 3.00% while XQQI yields 11.96%, so XQQI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XQQI better than SCHD?

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.