SEIV vs VYM
SEI QiM US Large Cap Value Active ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, SEIV or VYM?
SEIV has been ahead.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SEIV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SEIV is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEIV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.5B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 124 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +19.11%Best | +10.23% |
| 1Y Return | +28.44%Best | +14.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.73%Best | +17.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.3% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $21,594Best | $16,837 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.4%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2022 to Sep 23, 2026 (4.4 years).
SEIV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
SEIV vs VYM Performance
SEI QiM US Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) is an ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEIV returned +28.44% while VYM returned +14.28%. Year to date, SEIV is up 19.11% versus a gain of 10.23% for VYM.
Over three years, SEIV compounded at +26.73% per year against +17.50% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, SEIV has the edge at +19.12% annualized vs +12.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SEIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.3% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for SEIV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEIV charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEIV currently yields 1.05% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
57.9% of SEIV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 12.5% of VYM's money is in holdings SEIV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
74 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in SEIV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 124 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 455 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SEIV (84.6% of the fund), and 47 for SEIV that do not appear in VYM (40.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SEIV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.53% | 0.80% | 1.73% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 2.15% | 0.89% | 1.26% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 2.00% | 0.64% | 1.36% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 2.33% | 0.22% | 2.11% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 2.14% | 0.14% | 2.00% |
| PRUPrudential Financial Inc | 2.08% | 0.17% | 1.91% |
| HPQHp Inc. | 1.88% | 0.10% | 1.78% |
| SYFSynchrony Financial | 1.86% | 0.10% | 1.76% |
| FFord Motor Credit | 1.73% | 0.23% | 1.50% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.28% | 0.63% | 0.65% |
57.9% of SEIV is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEIV or VYM?
SEIV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SEIV or VYM?
Over the past year SEIV returned +28.44% vs +14.28% for VYM, so SEIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SEIV annualized +19.12% vs +12.57% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SEIV or VYM?
SEIV has been the more volatile fund at 16.3% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SEIV -18.2% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both SEIV and VYM?
SEIV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SEIV and VYM?
57.9% of SEIV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 12.5% of VYM's is in holdings SEIV also owns. They hold 74 positions in common, counted across the 123 positions we hold weights for in SEIV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEIV or VYM?
SEIV yields 1.05% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than SEIV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. SEIV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SEIV is less concentrated, with 25.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.