SEIV vs VTI
SEI QiM US Large Cap Value Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SEIV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SEIV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 124 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.53% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.15% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.96% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
SEIV vs VTI Performance
SEI QiM US Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) is a ETF from SEI EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SEIV returned +36.15% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SEIV is up 20.53% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SEIV compounded at +26.96% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, SEIV has the edge at +19.91% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SEIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for SEIV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SEIV charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SEIV currently yields 1.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SEIV and VTI share 106 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SEIV or VTI?
SEIV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SEIV or VTI?
Over the past year SEIV returned +36.15% vs +21.39% for VTI, so SEIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SEIV annualized +19.91% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SEIV or VTI?
SEIV has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SEIV -18.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SEIV and VTI?
SEIV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SEIV and VTI?
SEIV and VTI share 106 common holdings with a 17.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SEIV or VTI?
SEIV yields 1.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SEIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.