SNSR vs VOO
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SNSR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNSR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $224M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +26.38% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.58% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.02% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.69% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SNSR vs VOO Performance
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNSR returned +27.58% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, SNSR is up 26.38% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, SNSR compounded at +15.02% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.69% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +12.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for SNSR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNSR charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNSR currently yields 0.49% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SNSR and VOO share 11 holdings out of 548 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNSR or VOO?
SNSR has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNSR or VOO?
Over the past year SNSR returned +27.58% vs +21.87% for VOO, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SNSR annualized +12.50% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNSR or VOO?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SNSR -38.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SNSR and VOO?
SNSR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNSR and VOO?
SNSR and VOO share 11 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 548 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNSR or VOO?
SNSR yields 0.49% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.