SNSR vs VTI
Global X Internet of Things ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SNSR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SNSR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $224M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 73 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.38% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.58% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.02% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.69% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -38.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
SNSR vs VTI Performance
Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SNSR returned +27.58% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SNSR is up 26.38% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SNSR compounded at +15.02% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.69% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, SNSR has the edge at +12.50% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SNSR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -38.5% for SNSR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SNSR charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SNSR currently yields 0.49% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SNSR and VTI share 26 holdings out of 2815 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SNSR or VTI?
SNSR has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SNSR or VTI?
Over the past year SNSR returned +27.58% vs +22.35% for VTI, so SNSR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), SNSR annualized +12.50% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SNSR or VTI?
SNSR has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SNSR -38.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SNSR and VTI?
SNSR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SNSR and VTI?
SNSR and VTI share 26 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2815 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SNSR or VTI?
SNSR yields 0.49% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.