SPIT vs VOO
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SPIT or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SPIT led over 1Y. SPIT is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPIT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.85% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 50 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +19.03%Best | +14.14% |
| 1Y Return | +27.82%Best | +17.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.63% |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.1%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | F-m investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SPIT vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SPIT vs VOO Performance
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) is an ETF from F-m investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPIT returned +27.82% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, SPIT is up 19.03% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPIT charges 0.89% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPIT currently yields 5.85% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
12.5% of SPIT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.0% of VOO's money is in holdings SPIT also owns.
SPIT and VOO share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in SPIT and 494 in VOO, against full books of 50 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SPIT (87.2% of the fund), and 38 for SPIT that do not appear in VOO (84.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SPIT and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPIT or VOO?
SPIT has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPIT or VOO?
Over the past year SPIT returned +27.82% vs +17.31% for VOO, so SPIT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SPIT and VOO?
12.5% of SPIT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 12.0% of VOO's is in holdings SPIT also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in SPIT and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPIT or VOO?
SPIT yields 5.85% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SPIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SPIT?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SPIT led over 1Y. SPIT is less concentrated, with 35.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.