SPVM vs VTI
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SPVM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPVM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $137M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.43% | +13.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.64% | +19.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.92% | +20.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.32% | +11.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -45.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
SPVM vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPVM returned +22.64% while VTI returned +19.90%. Year to date, SPVM is up 14.43% versus a gain of 13.48% for VTI.
Over three years, SPVM compounded at +18.92% per year against +20.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.32% and +11.75% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SPVM has the edge at +10.17% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.9% for SPVM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPVM charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPVM currently yields 1.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SPVM and VTI share 91 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPVM or VTI?
SPVM has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPVM or VTI?
Over the past year SPVM returned +22.64% vs +19.90% for VTI, so SPVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SPVM annualized +10.17% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPVM or VTI?
SPVM has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SPVM -45.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SPVM and VTI?
SPVM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPVM and VTI?
SPVM and VTI share 91 common holdings with a 8.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPVM or VTI?
SPVM yields 1.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SPVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.