SRV vs VOO
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SRV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $295M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.33% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +23.80% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.05% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.35% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +26.59% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.5% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Cushing Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SRV vs VOO Performance
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is a ETF from Cushing Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRV returned +27.05% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, SRV is up 23.80% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, SRV compounded at +19.35% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +26.59% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs -15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.6% for SRV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRV charges 4.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $425 vs $3 annually, a gap of $422 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRV currently yields 15.33% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SRV and VOO share 15 holdings out of 536 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRV or VOO?
SRV has an expense ratio of 4.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $422 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRV or VOO?
Over the past year SRV returned +27.05% vs +23.71% for VOO, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SRV annualized -15.05% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRV or VOO?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRV -99.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRV and VOO?
SRV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRV and VOO?
SRV and VOO share 15 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 536 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRV or VOO?
SRV yields 15.33% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.