SRV vs VOO
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SRV or VOO?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SRV led over 1Y and 5Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 4.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $295M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 17.27% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 66 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +21.57%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +18.48%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.14% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.31%Best | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.0% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $28,510Best | $18,827 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Cushing Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16 years).
SRV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
SRV vs VOO Performance
NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) is an ETF from Cushing Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRV returned +18.48% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, SRV is up 21.57% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, SRV compounded at +19.14% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +23.31% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs -13.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRV charges 4.25% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $425 vs $3 annually, a gap of $422 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRV currently yields 17.27% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
28.8% of SRV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.9% of VOO's money is in holdings SRV also owns.
SRV and VOO share little of their money.
14 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in SRV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 66 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 473 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SRV (97.2% of the fund), and 34 for SRV that do not appear in VOO (57.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SRV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 5.10% | 0.14% | 4.96% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 4.85% | 0.09% | 4.76% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.98% | 0.09% | 2.89% |
| VSTVistra Energy Corp. | 2.87% | 0.07% | 2.80% |
| NRGNrg Energy | 2.84% | 0.04% | 2.80% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 2.44% | 0.13% | 2.31% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.38% | 0.10% | 2.28% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 2.19% | 0.16% | 2.03% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 1.61% | 0.41% | 1.20% |
| DDominion Energy Inc. | 0.58% | 0.09% | 0.49% |
28.8% of SRV is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRV or VOO?
SRV has an expense ratio of 4.25% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $422 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRV or VOO?
Over the past year SRV returned +18.48% vs +16.61% for VOO, so SRV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SRV annualized -13.07% vs +13.39% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRV or VOO?
SRV has been the more volatile fund at 38.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO.
Should I hold both SRV and VOO?
SRV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SRV and VOO?
28.8% of SRV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.9% of VOO's is in holdings SRV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in SRV and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRV or VOO?
SRV yields 17.27% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SRV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SRV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SRV led over 1Y and 5Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.