SSUS vs VTI
Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SSUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSUS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $590M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 17 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.58% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.95% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.81% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.90% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Day Hagan Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 16, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
SSUS vs VTI Performance
Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) is a ETF from Day Hagan Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSUS returned +21.95% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SSUS is up 14.58% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SSUS compounded at +17.81% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.90% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SSUS has the edge at +13.66% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.9% for SSUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.8% for SSUS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSUS charges 0.77% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSUS currently yields 0.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SSUS and VTI share 5 holdings out of 2798 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSUS or VTI?
SSUS has an expense ratio of 0.77% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SSUS or VTI?
Over the past year SSUS returned +21.95% vs +21.39% for VTI, so SSUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SSUS annualized +13.66% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SSUS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.9% for SSUS. Worst drawdown: SSUS -23.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SSUS and VTI?
SSUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between SSUS and VTI?
SSUS and VTI share 5 common holdings with a 11.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSUS or VTI?
SSUS yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.