STK vs VYM
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. STK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | STK | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $831M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.48% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 75 | 613 | |
| YTD Return | +44.24% | +14.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +77.53% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.56% | +18.69% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +19.88% | +11.98% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 25, 2009 | Nov 10, 2006 |
STK vs VYM Performance
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK) is a ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year STK returned +77.53% while VYM returned +21.39%. Year to date, STK is up 44.24% versus a gain of 14.87% for VYM.
Over three years, STK compounded at +31.56% per year against +18.69% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +19.88% and +11.98% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, STK has the edge at +9.28% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
STK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 14.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for STK and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
STK charges 1.13% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $4 annually, a gap of $109 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, STK currently yields 3.48% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
STK and VYM share 11 holdings out of 654 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, STK or VYM?
STK has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $109 per year of difference.
Which performed better, STK or VYM?
Over the past year STK returned +77.53% vs +21.39% for VYM, so STK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), STK annualized +9.28% vs +7.00% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, STK or VYM?
STK has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 14.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: STK -42.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both STK and VYM?
STK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between STK and VYM?
STK and VYM share 11 common holdings with a 9.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 654 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, STK or VYM?
STK yields 3.48% while VYM yields 2.24%, so STK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.