TFPN vs VXUS
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFPN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $161M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 404 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.08% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.21% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.70% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Blueprint fund management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TFPN vs VXUS Performance
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is a ETF from Blueprint fund management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TFPN returned +27.21% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, TFPN is up 15.08% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, TFPN compounded at +6.70% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, TFPN has the edge at +6.67% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for TFPN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for TFPN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFPN charges 1.13% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $5 annually, a gap of $108 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TFPN currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TFPN and VXUS share 31 holdings out of 8060 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFPN or VXUS?
TFPN has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $108 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TFPN or VXUS?
Over the past year TFPN returned +27.21% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TFPN annualized +6.67% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TFPN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for TFPN. Worst drawdown: TFPN -16.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TFPN and VXUS?
TFPN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TFPN and VXUS?
TFPN and VXUS share 31 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8060 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TFPN or VXUS?
TFPN yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.