TFPN vs VYM
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. TFPN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFPN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $161M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 404 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.62% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.72% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.79% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Blueprint fund management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
TFPN vs VYM Performance
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is a ETF from Blueprint fund management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TFPN returned +26.72% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, TFPN is up 14.62% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, TFPN compounded at +6.79% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +6.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.4% for TFPN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for TFPN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFPN charges 1.13% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $4 annually, a gap of $109 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TFPN currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
TFPN and VYM share 63 holdings out of 725 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFPN or VYM?
TFPN has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $109 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TFPN or VYM?
Over the past year TFPN returned +26.72% vs +26.05% for VYM, so TFPN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TFPN annualized +6.52% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TFPN or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.4% for TFPN. Worst drawdown: TFPN -16.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both TFPN and VYM?
TFPN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TFPN and VYM?
TFPN and VYM share 63 common holdings with a 6.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 725 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TFPN or VYM?
TFPN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.