IVV vs TFPN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TFPN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TFPN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.13% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $161M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 404 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +14.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +25.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +6.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.7% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Blueprint fund management | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 11, 2023 |
IVV vs TFPN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is a ETF from Blueprint fund management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while TFPN returned +25.73%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 14.77% for TFPN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +6.82% for TFPN. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.4% for TFPN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.7% for TFPN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TFPN charges 1.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $113 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for TFPN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TFPN share 116 holdings out of 619 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TFPN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TFPN charges 1.13%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $110 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TFPN?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +25.73% for TFPN, so TFPN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +6.56% for TFPN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TFPN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.4% for TFPN. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TFPN -16.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and TFPN?
IVV and TFPN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TFPN?
IVV and TFPN share 116 common holdings with a 9.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 619 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TFPN?
IVV yields 1.09% while TFPN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.