IVV vs TFPN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF
Which is better, IVV or TFPN?
Large Cap Blend against Multi Alternative.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, TFPN over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TFPN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.13% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $161M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 423 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +16.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +24.32%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +7.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 13.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -16.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $17,860Best | $12,332 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Blueprint fund management |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 11, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.2 years).
IVV vs TFPN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TFPN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is an ETF from Blueprint fund management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TFPN returned +24.32%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 16.23% for TFPN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +7.30% for TFPN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TFPN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -16.7% for TFPN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TFPN charges 1.13%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $113 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TFPN.
Holdings Overlap
At least 32.1% of IVV's money is in holdings TFPN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for TFPN, our book for it covers 86.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
38 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in TFPN, against full books of 508 and 423.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TFPN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 2.35% | 5.72% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 1.60% | 5.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 0.17% | 5.52% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.52% | 3.00% | 2.48% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.53% | 2.87% | 2.34% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.16% | 2.91% | 2.75% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.55% | 2.48% | 1.93% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.61% | 2.29% | 1.68% |
| DEDeere & Co Sedol 2261203 | 0.25% | 2.29% | 2.04% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 1.07% | 0.31% |
32.1% of IVV is already inside TFPN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TFPN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TFPN charges 1.13%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $110 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TFPN?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +24.32% for TFPN, so TFPN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TFPN?
TFPN has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs TFPN -16.7%.
Should I hold both IVV and TFPN?
IVV and TFPN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TFPN?
At least 32.1% of IVV's money is in holdings TFPN also owns. Our book for TFPN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in TFPN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TFPN?
IVV yields 1.06% while TFPN yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TFPN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, TFPN over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.