TFPN vs VTI
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TFPN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFPN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $159M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 423 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +15.65% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.46% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.39% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Blueprint fund management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
TFPN vs VTI Performance
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is a ETF from Blueprint fund management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TFPN returned +29.46% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, TFPN is up 15.65% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, TFPN compounded at +7.39% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.4% for TFPN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for TFPN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFPN charges 1.13% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $3 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TFPN currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TFPN and VTI share 156 holdings out of 2861 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFPN or VTI?
TFPN has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $110 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TFPN or VTI?
Over the past year TFPN returned +29.46% vs +22.35% for VTI, so TFPN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TFPN annualized +6.77% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TFPN or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.4% for TFPN. Worst drawdown: TFPN -16.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TFPN and VTI?
TFPN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TFPN and VTI?
TFPN and VTI share 156 common holdings with a 10.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2861 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TFPN or VTI?
TFPN yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.