TFPN vs VOO
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TFPN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFPN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.13% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $161M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 404 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.17% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.44% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.95% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Blueprint fund management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TFPN vs VOO Performance
Blueprint Chesapeake Multi-Asset Trend ETF (TFPN) is a ETF from Blueprint fund management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TFPN returned +26.44% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, TFPN is up 15.17% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, TFPN compounded at +6.95% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +6.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.4% for TFPN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for TFPN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFPN charges 1.13% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $3 annually, a gap of $110 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TFPN currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TFPN and VOO share 114 holdings out of 621 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFPN or VOO?
TFPN has an expense ratio of 1.13% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $110 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TFPN or VOO?
Over the past year TFPN returned +26.44% vs +21.63% for VOO, so TFPN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), TFPN annualized +6.68% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TFPN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.4% for TFPN. Worst drawdown: TFPN -16.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TFPN and VOO?
TFPN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TFPN and VOO?
TFPN and VOO share 114 common holdings with a 11.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 621 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TFPN or VOO?
TFPN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.