TPRY vs VOO

TPRY vs VOO

Which is better, TPRY or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.5%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTPRYVOO
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$4M$997.4B
Dividend Yield7.88%1.04%
Holdings63509
YTD Return+4.31%+13.21%Best
1Y Return-+17.37%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.66%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.14%
Top 10 Weight68.5%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyVistaSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 26, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TPRY vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TPRY vs VOO Performance

VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF (TPRY) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TPRY is up 4.31% versus a gain of 13.21% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TPRY charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TPRY currently yields 7.88% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

TPRY already in VOO74.8%
VOO already in TPRY30.2%

74.8% of TPRY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.2% of VOO's money is in holdings TPRY also owns.

Most of TPRY is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

14 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in TPRY and 494 in VOO, against full books of 63 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 473 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TPRY (69.0% of the fund), and 3 for TPRY that do not appear in VOO (7.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TPRYWeight in VOODifference
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc12.28%4.13%8.15%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.12.87%1.44%11.43%
NVDANvidia Corp4.42%7.55%3.13%
AAPLApple, Inc4.54%7.05%2.51%
GOOGAlphabet Inc6.54%2.62%3.92%
METAMeta Platforms Inc4.82%1.90%2.92%
UBERUber Technologies Inc5.46%0.22%5.24%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.4.73%0.07%4.66%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity4.23%0.57%3.66%
BABoeing Co4.48%0.26%4.22%

74.8% of TPRY is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TPRYVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TPRY or VOO?

TPRY has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TPRY and VOO?

74.8% of TPRY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 30.2% of VOO's is in holdings TPRY also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in TPRY and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, TPRY or VOO?

TPRY yields 7.88% while VOO yields 1.04%, so TPRY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TPRY?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.