UFO vs VTI
Procure Space ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. UFO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UFO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $633M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.03% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +54.52% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.15% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.83% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Procure ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 10, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
UFO vs VTI Performance
Procure Space ETF (UFO) is a ETF from Procure ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UFO returned +54.52% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, UFO is up 14.03% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, UFO compounded at +38.15% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.83% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, UFO has the edge at +9.78% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for UFO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UFO charges 0.94% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UFO currently yields 0.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
UFO and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2821 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UFO or VTI?
UFO has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UFO or VTI?
Over the past year UFO returned +54.52% vs +22.35% for VTI, so UFO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), UFO annualized +9.78% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UFO or VTI?
UFO has been the more volatile fund at 32.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UFO -50.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both UFO and VTI?
UFO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UFO and VTI?
UFO and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2821 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UFO or VTI?
UFO yields 0.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.