UFO vs VOO
Procure Space ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, UFO or VOO?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UFO led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UFO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $561M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 67 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +8.52% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +32.12%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.69%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.58% | +12.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.1% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,092 | $18,335Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.0% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Procure ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 10, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 11, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.4 years).
UFO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.
UFO vs VOO Performance
Procure Space ETF (UFO) is an ETF from Procure ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UFO returned +32.12% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, UFO is up 8.52% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Over three years, UFO compounded at +34.69% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.58% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.43% annualized vs +8.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.1% compared with 16.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for UFO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UFO charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UFO currently yields 0.34% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
33.8% of UFO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.4% of VOO's money is in holdings UFO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, UFO as of Aug 18, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
10 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in UFO and 505 in VOO, against full books of 67 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for UFO (98.1% of the fund), and 26 for UFO that do not appear in VOO (47.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in UFO | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRMNGarminltd. | 6.56% | 0.06% | 6.50% |
| TRMBTrimble Inc. | 5.94% | 0.02% | 5.92% |
| SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a'' | 4.15% | 0.02% | 4.13% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 3.23% | 0.40% | 2.83% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 2.95% | 0.16% | 2.79% |
| BABoeing Co | 2.68% | 0.26% | 2.42% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 2.81% | 0.11% | 2.70% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 2.39% | 0.08% | 2.31% |
| HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc | 2.01% | 0.11% | 1.90% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.07% | 0.14% | 0.93% |
33.8% of UFO is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UFO or VOO?
UFO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, UFO or VOO?
Over the past year UFO returned +32.12% vs +20.08% for VOO, so UFO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), UFO annualized +8.99% vs +15.43% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, UFO or VOO?
UFO has been the more volatile fund at 32.1% annualized versus 16.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UFO -50.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UFO and VOO?
UFO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between UFO and VOO?
33.8% of UFO's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.4% of VOO's is in holdings UFO also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in UFO and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, UFO or VOO?
UFO yields 0.34% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than UFO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UFO led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.