UFO vs VOO
Procure Space ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. UFO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UFO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.94% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $595M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.36% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.16% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +36.96% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.98% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Procure ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 10, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
UFO vs VOO Performance
Procure Space ETF (UFO) is a ETF from Procure ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UFO returned +57.16% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, UFO is up 20.36% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, UFO compounded at +36.96% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.98% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.5% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for UFO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UFO charges 0.94% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $94 vs $3 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UFO currently yields 0.29% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
UFO and VOO share 10 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UFO or VOO?
UFO has an expense ratio of 0.94% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UFO or VOO?
Over the past year UFO returned +57.16% vs +22.02% for VOO, so UFO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), UFO annualized +10.62% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UFO or VOO?
UFO has been the more volatile fund at 32.5% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UFO -50.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UFO and VOO?
UFO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UFO and VOO?
UFO and VOO share 10 common holdings with a 1.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UFO or VOO?
UFO yields 0.29% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.