URNM vs VTI
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, URNM or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. URNM led over the full window, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URNM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.06% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -18.73% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | -16.80% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.68% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.55% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 46.3% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,390 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 78.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2019 to Sep 25, 2026 (6.8 years).
URNM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
URNM vs VTI Performance
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URNM returned -16.80% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, URNM is down 18.73% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Over three years, URNM compounded at +4.68% per year against +23.04% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.55% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, URNM has the edge at +25.46% annualized vs +14.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URNM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 46.3% compared with 17.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.8% for URNM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URNM charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URNM currently yields 3.06% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
12.8% of URNM's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
URNM and VTI share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in URNM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 27 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for URNM (97.4% of the fund), and 0 for URNM that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of URNM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URNM or VTI?
URNM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, URNM or VTI?
Over the past year URNM returned -16.80% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), URNM annualized +25.46% vs +14.96% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, URNM or VTI?
URNM has been the more volatile fund at 46.3% annualized versus 17.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: URNM -50.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both URNM and VTI?
URNM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between URNM and VTI?
12.8% of URNM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings URNM also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in URNM and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, URNM or VTI?
URNM yields 3.06% while VTI yields 1.03%, so URNM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than URNM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. URNM led over the full window, VTI over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.