URNM vs VOO
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URNM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.32% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -9.89% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.54% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.12% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +18.25% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 45.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | Sep 7, 2010 |
URNM vs VOO Performance
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URNM returned +20.54% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, URNM is down 9.89% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, URNM compounded at +19.12% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +18.25% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, URNM has the edge at +27.92% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URNM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 45.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.8% for URNM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URNM charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URNM currently yields 3.32% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
URNM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 530 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URNM or VOO?
URNM has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, URNM or VOO?
Over the past year URNM returned +20.54% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), URNM annualized +27.92% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, URNM or VOO?
URNM has been the more volatile fund at 45.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: URNM -50.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both URNM and VOO?
URNM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between URNM and VOO?
URNM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 530 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, URNM or VOO?
URNM yields 3.32% while VOO yields 1.09%, so URNM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.