USVM vs VOO
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, USVM or VOO?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. USVM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. USVM is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | USVM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.85% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 289 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +17.04%Best | +11.48% |
| 1Y Return | +21.12%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.09% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.43% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,422 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 7.0%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 26, 2017 to Sep 15, 2026 (8.9 years).
USVM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
USVM vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USVM returned +21.12% while VOO returned +15.94%. Year to date, USVM is up 17.04% versus a gain of 11.48% for VOO.
Over three years, USVM compounded at +19.09% per year against +21.01% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.43% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.01% annualized vs +10.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USVM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 16.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.1% for USVM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
USVM charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USVM currently yields 1.85% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
5.4% of USVM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's money is in holdings USVM also owns.
USVM and VOO share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 287 positions we hold weights for in USVM and 494 in VOO, against full books of 289 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 475 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for USVM (98.9% of the fund), and 267 for USVM that do not appear in VOO (91.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in USVM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PNWPinnacle West Capital Corp. | 0.75% | 0.02% | 0.73% |
| EGEverest Group Ltd Common Stock | 0.58% | 0.02% | 0.56% |
| SOLVSolventum Corp | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.51% |
| HSICHenry Schein Inc | 0.52% | 0.01% | 0.51% |
| HSTHost Hotels & Resorts Inc | 0.49% | 0.02% | 0.47% |
| BENFranklin Resources Inc. | 0.48% | 0.02% | 0.46% |
| UHSUniversal Health Services Inc. | 0.44% | 0.01% | 0.43% |
| IVZInvesco Plc | 0.43% | 0.02% | 0.41% |
| VTRSViatris Inc. | 0.37% | 0.03% | 0.34% |
| APAApa Corp | 0.31% | 0.02% | 0.29% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of USVM and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, USVM or VOO?
USVM has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, USVM or VOO?
Over the past year USVM returned +21.12% vs +15.94% for VOO, so USVM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), USVM annualized +10.00% vs +14.01% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, USVM or VOO?
USVM has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 16.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: USVM -44.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both USVM and VOO?
USVM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between USVM and VOO?
5.4% of USVM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.2% of VOO's is in holdings USVM also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 287 positions we hold weights for in USVM and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, USVM or VOO?
USVM yields 1.85% while VOO yields 1.04%, so USVM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than USVM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. USVM led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. USVM is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.