VAMO vs VTI
Cambria Value and Momentum Hedged Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, VAMO or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VAMO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $85M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 208 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +2.92% | +10.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.22% | +11.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.21% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.10% | +10.57%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -41.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,091 | $16,527Best |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 8, 2015 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2015 to Nov 10, 2026 (11.2 years).
VAMO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.2 years both funds cover.
VAMO vs VTI Performance
Cambria Value and Momentum Hedged Equity ETF (VAMO) is an ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VAMO returned +7.22% while VTI returned +11.60%. Year to date, VAMO is up 2.92% versus a gain of 10.82% for VTI.
Over three years, VAMO compounded at +12.21% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.10% and +10.57% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.12% annualized vs +4.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 13.0% for VAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.8% for VAMO and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VAMO charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VAMO currently yields 0.65% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.2% of VTI's money is in holdings VAMO also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VAMO, our book for it covers 94.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and VAMO share little of their money.
99 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in VAMO and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 208 and 3,542.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VAMO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCitigroup Inc. | 0.88% | 0.29% | 0.59% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp. | 1.01% | 0.15% | 0.86% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 0.99% | 0.14% | 0.85% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.98% | 0.14% | 0.84% |
| VLOValero Energy | 0.97% | 0.15% | 0.82% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.77% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 0.91% | 0.17% | 0.74% |
| CAHCardinal Health | 0.98% | 0.07% | 0.91% |
| SLDESlide Insurance Holdings Inc | 1.04% | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| OVVOvintiv Inc. | 1.02% | 0.02% | 1.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VAMO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VAMO or VTI?
VAMO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VAMO or VTI?
Over the past year VAMO returned +7.22% vs +11.60% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), VAMO annualized +4.18% vs +13.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VAMO or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 13.0% for VAMO. Worst drawdown: VAMO -41.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both VAMO and VTI?
VAMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VAMO and VTI?
At least 2.2% of VTI's money is in holdings VAMO also owns. Our book for VAMO is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 99 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in VAMO and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, VAMO or VTI?
VAMO yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than VAMO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.