VAMO vs VOO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VAMO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $87M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.61% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.78% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.41% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.01% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.62% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Cambria Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 8, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
VAMO vs VOO Performance
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VAMO returned +17.41% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, VAMO is up 6.78% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, VAMO compounded at +13.01% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.62% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.0% for VAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.8% for VAMO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VAMO charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VAMO currently yields 0.61% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
VAMO and VOO share 18 holdings out of 588 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VAMO or VOO?
VAMO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VAMO or VOO?
Over the past year VAMO returned +17.41% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), VAMO annualized +4.62% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VAMO or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.0% for VAMO. Worst drawdown: VAMO -41.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both VAMO and VOO?
VAMO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VAMO and VOO?
VAMO and VOO share 18 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 588 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VAMO or VOO?
VAMO yields 0.61% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.