VB vs VTV
Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VB offers more diversification with 1,311 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VB | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $79.7B | $187.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.22% | 1.85% | |
| Holdings | 1,311 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +17.13% | +18.15% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.90% | +25.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.26% | +19.20% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.59% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.0% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2004 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VB vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (VB) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VB returned +21.90% while VTV returned +25.72%. Year to date, VB is up 17.13% versus a gain of 18.15% for VTV.
Over three years, VB compounded at +17.26% per year against +19.20% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.59% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VB has the edge at +8.81% annualized vs +7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.0% for VB and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VB charges 0.03% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VB currently yields 1.22% against 1.85% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
VB and VTV share 7 holdings out of 1602 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VB or VTV?
VB has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VB or VTV?
Over the past year VB returned +21.90% vs +25.72% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VB annualized +8.81% vs +7.59% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VB or VTV?
VB has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VB -61.0% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VB and VTV?
VB and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VB and VTV?
VB and VTV share 7 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1602 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VB or VTV?
VB yields 1.22% while VTV yields 1.85%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.