VFQY vs VOO
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, VFQY or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VFQY is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VFQY | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $501M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 452 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +11.86% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.15% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.80% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.14% | +13.49%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,485 | $18,827Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 15.3%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 15, 2018 to Sep 18, 2026 (8.6 years).
VFQY vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.6 years both funds cover.
VFQY vs VOO Performance
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VFQY returned +13.15% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, VFQY is up 11.86% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, VFQY compounded at +15.80% per year against +21.37% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.14% and +13.49% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.74% annualized vs +11.23%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VFQY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for VFQY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VFQY charges 0.13% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $3 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VFQY currently yields 1.02% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
55.6% of VFQY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.7% of VOO's money is in holdings VFQY also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
122 positions in common, counted across the 469 positions we hold weights for in VFQY and 494 in VOO, against full books of 452 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 366 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for VFQY (63.5% of the fund), and 333 for VFQY that do not appear in VOO (42.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VFQY | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 1.53% | 7.05% | 5.52% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.43% | 7.55% | 7.12% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.10% | 1.41% | 0.31% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.80% | 1.46% | 0.66% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 1.79% | 0.28% | 1.51% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.07% | 1.90% | 1.83% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 1.61% | 0.25% | 1.36% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.17% | 0.66% | 0.51% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.83% | 0.96% | 0.13% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 1.46% | 0.29% | 1.17% |
55.6% of VFQY is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VFQY or VOO?
VFQY has an expense ratio of 0.13% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VFQY or VOO?
Over the past year VFQY returned +13.15% vs +16.61% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VFQY annualized +11.23% vs +13.74% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VFQY or VOO?
VFQY has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VFQY -37.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both VFQY and VOO?
VFQY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VFQY and VOO?
55.6% of VFQY's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 35.7% of VOO's is in holdings VFQY also owns. They hold 122 positions in common, counted across the 469 positions we hold weights for in VFQY and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, VFQY or VOO?
VFQY yields 1.02% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than VFQY?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VFQY is less concentrated, with 15.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.