VFQY vs VOO
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VFQY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.13% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $485M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 409 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.70% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.06% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.30% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.29% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 13, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
VFQY vs VOO Performance
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VFQY returned +21.06% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, VFQY is up 15.70% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, VFQY compounded at +17.30% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.29% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +11.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VFQY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.4% for VFQY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VFQY charges 0.13% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $13 vs $3 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VFQY currently yields 1.04% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
VFQY and VOO share 114 holdings out of 833 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VFQY or VOO?
VFQY has an expense ratio of 0.13% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VFQY or VOO?
Over the past year VFQY returned +21.06% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VFQY annualized +11.78% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VFQY or VOO?
VFQY has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VFQY -37.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both VFQY and VOO?
VFQY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VFQY and VOO?
VFQY and VOO share 114 common holdings with a 16.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 833 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VFQY or VOO?
VFQY yields 1.04% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.